<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automotive X-Prize Entry Yeilds 80MPG, 400HP Fox Body Mustang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.easyautosales.com/automotive-x-prize-fox-body-mustang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.easyautosales.com/automotive-x-prize-fox-body-mustang/</link>
	<description>Check us out under the hood!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:59:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Great American Hot Rod, Redux!</title>
		<link>http://blog.easyautosales.com/automotive-x-prize-fox-body-mustang/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great American Hot Rod, Redux!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.easyautosales.com/?p=42#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] was beating up on old 60s Mustangs, with only the HiPo 289 being able to challenge it. The newer Mustangs were gaining speed and engine size with standard 302 cubic inch V8s and 429 performance versions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was beating up on old 60s Mustangs, with only the HiPo 289 being able to challenge it. The newer Mustangs were gaining speed and engine size with standard 302 cubic inch V8s and 429 performance versions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
